4.3 Article

Single blastocyst transfer (SET) and pregnancy outcome of day 5 and day 6 human blastocysts vitrified using a closed device

Journal

CRYOBIOLOGY
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 40-45

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2018.08.004

Keywords

Blastocyst vitrification; Closed vitrification system; Day-5 and Day-6; Single blastocyst transfer; Pregnancy outcome

Funding

  1. Edinburgh Assisted Conception Programme, EFREC, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the utility of the Rapid-i closed device for vitrification of human blastocysts on day-5 (D5) and day-6 (D6) of development and the implantation and pregnancy rate following single blastocyst transfer (SBT) of warmed D5/D6 blastocysts. This retrospective cohort study was performed at Edinburgh Assisted Conception Programme, EFREC, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh between January 2013 and January 2017. Good quality blastocysts were vitrified on D5 or D6 using Irvine Vitrification medium (Irvine Scientific-USA) and the Rapid-I closed Vitrification System (TM) (Vitrolife, Sweden). After warming, blastocysts were cultured in G-TL (TM) medium (Vitrolife) supplemented with 20% HSA-solution (TM) (Human Serum Albumin) for 2 h before the transfer. The survival, pregnancy and implantation rates were compared in relation to the day of culture at the time of vitrification (D5/D6) in 1090 cryopreserved cycles. The overall survival rate was 93.4% (1018/1090) with no significant difference between the D5 and D6 groups: 93.9% (712/758) and 92.2% (306/332) respectively. Single embryo transfers of D6 vitrified/warmed blastocysts resulted in a lower implantation and clinical pregnancy rate compared to D5 embryos. The implantation rate (IPR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) were respectively 49.6% and 43.0% for the D5 and 37.0% and 33.0% for the D6 embryos, which was statistically significant. The multiple pregnancy rate was 1.08% (0.98% for D5 vs 1.3% for day 6).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available