4.3 Article

Effect of Gynostemma Pentaphyllum Polysaccharide on boar spermatozoa quality following freezing-thawing

Journal

CRYOBIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages 244-249

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2009.04.008

Keywords

Gynostemma Pentaphyllum Polysaccharide (GPP) Cryopreservation; Boar semen; Standard semen parameters; Antioxidant activities

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program [2008AA101004]
  2. Startup Fund of Science and Research of Northwest A F University [01140514, A213020901]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gynostemma Pentaphyllum Polysaccharide (GPP) was added at concentrations of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mg/ml to the extenders used to freeze boar semen and its effects on the quality of frozen-thawed sperm were assessed. The sperm motility was significantly higher in the extenders containing 0.25 and 0.5 mg/ml GPP. as compared to other groups (P < 0.05). The extender supplemented with 0.5 mg/ml GPP favored the highest intact membrane and intact acrosome percentages in comparison with other groups (P < 0.05), respectively. The mitochondrial activity was significantly higher at the concentrations of 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/ml GPP than that of other treatments, and the control group (P < 0.05). In biochemical assays, the extender supplemented with 0.25 and 0.5 mg/ml GPP significantly improved SOD levels, compared to other groups (P > 0.05). However, the extenders supplemented with GPP did not cause significant differences in levels of CAT and GSH-Px, compared to the control (P > 0.05). In summary, GPP exhibited a dose-related response and the lower concentration produced greater protective effect. According to the standard semen quality parameters and antioxidant activities measured in this study, the concentration of 0.5 mg/ml GPP caused a beneficial cryoprotective effects on the quality of frozen-thawed boar semen. It is proposed that an extender containing 0.5 mg/ml GPP could be used as cryoprotective medium of better efficiency. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available