4.5 Article

Yield Determination and Water-Use Efficiency of Wheat under Water-Limited Conditions in the US Southern High Plains

Journal

CROP SCIENCE
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 34-47

Publisher

CROP SCIENCE SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2013.02.0108

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Texas Wheat Producers Board
  2. USDA Agriculral Research Service, Kansas State University
  3. Texas A&M AgriLife Research
  4. Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service
  5. Texas Tech University
  6. West Texas AM University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drought is the most important stress for reducing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield and water-use efficiency (WUE) in the U. S. Southern High Plains (SHP). Adoption of cultivars with higher yield and WUE under drought conditions is critical in the area. The objective of this study was to investigate the physiological basis of yield determination and WUE of wheat in the SHP. A 2-yr field experiment was conducted in 10 genotypes under dryland and irrigated conditions. The newer cultivars or more drought tolerant genotypes had higher yield, biomass, WUE, and water-use efficiency for biomass (WUEbm) under drought. Genotypes with higher yield had more seeds per spike and higher 1000-kernel weight (TKW). The WUE or WUEbm was determined by yield or biomass as genotypic differences in evapotranspiration were not significant. Biomass at anthesis significantly contributed to higher yield under drought. Yield, spikes per square meter, TKW, and harvest index were correlated to spike, stem, and total dry weights per unit area at anthesis. Single stem dry weight was linearly related to seeds per spike. For dryland wheat, remobilization of stem C reserves contributed to yield in 1 yr and to seeds per spike and seeds per square meter in both years. The amount of remobilization was linearly related to single stem dry weight at anthesis. The results of this study indicated that stem dry weight at anthesis may be an important trait for high yield in the SHP environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available