4.5 Article

Variability for Seed Phytosterols in Sunflower Germplasm

Journal

CROP SCIENCE
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 190-197

Publisher

CROP SCIENCE SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2013.05.0285

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Junta de Andalucia [P07-AGR-03011]
  2. EU FEDER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seeds and oils are rich sources of phytosterols, which are important compounds for human nutrition. There is limited information on variability for seed phytosterols in sunflower germplasm. The objective of this research was to evaluate kernel phytosterol content and profile in sunflower germplasm and to confirm phytosterol traits under several environments. Kernel phytosterol content in a collection of 985 accessions ranged from 1319 to 5119 mg kg(-1). Large variation was also observed for the concentrations of campesterol (32 to 197 g kg(-1) phytosterols), stigmasterol (41 to 128 g kg(-1)), beta-sitosterol (448 to 755 g kg(-1)), and Delta(7)-stigmastenol (8 to 274 g kg(-1)). Seventy-two accessions selected for high phytosterol content and/or different profiles were evaluated for 2 yr under sib-pollination. From these, 20 accessions were selected based on phytosterol traits and further evaluated in two replicated field trials. Lines HA 89 and IASP-18, with conventional and high phytosterol content, respectively, were used as controls. Phytosterol traits such as high phytosterol content (up to 3682 mg kg(-1) compared to 2686 mg kg(-1) in HA 89 and 4957 mg kg(-1) in IASP-18) as well as high concentrations of campesterol (180 g kg(-1) compared to a maximum of 66 g kg(-1) in control line IASP-18), stigmasterol (161 g kg(-1) compared to 64 g kg(-1) in HA 89), and Delta(7)-stigmastenol (300 g kg(-1) compared to 163 g kg(-1) in HA 89) were confirmed. Selected accessions will be of great value for future basic and applied research on phytosterols in sunflower.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available