4.5 Article

High Night Temperature and Abscisic Acid Affect Rice Productivity through Altered Photosynthesis, Respiration and Spikelet Fertility

Journal

CROP SCIENCE
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages 2603-2612

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2013.01.0060

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High night temperature (HNT) is among the important abiotic stresses limiting rice production. The impacts of abscisic acid (ABA) on higher plants have been the subject of many studies. However, little or no work has been performed on rice responses to ABA under HNT-stress conditions. This study determined the effects of ABA on rice leaf photosynthetic rate (P-N), photochemistry, respiration, and physiology under HNT. Plants were grown under ambient night temperature (ANT; 25 degrees C) or HNT (30 degrees C) with or without ABA (100 ppm) application from the boot stage of rice plants until harvest. The HNT decreased rice yield (11%), which was associated with decreasing P-N (5%), pollen viability (11%), and spikelet fertility (5%) and increasing respiration rate (44%). In addition, HNT decreased grain width (4%) and increased grain chalkiness (65%), thereby decreasing grain quality. The ABA-treated plants showed increased yield (15%) as a result of increased P-N (6%) and spikelet fertility (6%) and decreased respiration (33%), under HNT. The increased P-N under HNT as a result of ABA application is associated with increased stomatal conductance (22%) and decreased nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ; 29%). In addition, ABA-treated plants grown under ANT also showed increased yield (9%) as a result of increased P-N (7%) and spikelet fertility (7%) and decreased respiration (16%). The increased P-N under ANT as a result of ABA application was due to increased quantum yield (8%) and electron transport rate (8%). This study shows that exogenous application of ABA has the potential to increase rice yields under HNT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available