4.5 Article

Effect of tillage systems, seeding rates, and herbicides on weed growth and grain yield in dry-seeded rice systems in the Philippines

Journal

CROP PROTECTION
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 244-250

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2013.09.001

Keywords

Direct seeding; Seeding rate; Weed management; Cultural control; Biomass; Philippines

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Asia, dry-seeded rice (DSR) production systems are increasing because of water and labour scarcities. DSR can be sown under zero-till (ZT) or after conventional tillage (CONT) operations. In these seeding systems, however, weeds are the main biological constraint. A study was conducted during the wet season of 2012 and the dry season of 2013 at the International Rice Research Institute to evaluate the effect of the tillage systems (ZT and CONT), seeding rate [low seeding rate (LSR) at 50 kg ha(-1), and high seeding rate (HSR) at 100 kg ha(-1)], and weed control treatments (oxadiazon applied as pre-emergence, oxadiazon applied as pre-emergence followed by a commercial mixture of fenoxaprop + ethoxysulfuron as post-emergence at 21-24 days after sowing, and weedy) on weed growth and grain yield in DSR systems. The efficacy of herbicides 14 days after the application of post-emergence herbicide was similar between the tillage systems and between seeding rates. At crop harvest, weed biomass was higher in the ZT plots than in the CONT plots, and higher at LSR than at HSR. At the same time, herbicide applications decreased weed biomass by 73-96%, compared with the weedy plots. Compared with the ZT plots, CONT plots had 9-18% higher grain yield. Similarly, plots sown at HSR had 17-19% higher grain yield than at LSR. Weedy plots had 81-84% less yield than the herbicide-treated plots (3060-3380 kg ha(-1) in the wet season and 5820-5950 kg ha(-1) in the dry season). (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available