4.5 Article

Baseline susceptibility to chlorantraniliprole of Brazilian populations of Plutella xylostella

Journal

CROP PROTECTION
Volume 35, Issue -, Pages 97-101

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.01.013

Keywords

Geographic variation; Anthranilic diamides; Diamondback moth; Resistance monitoring; Discriminating concentration

Categories

Funding

  1. National Council of Scientific and Technological Development - CNPq [470825/2008-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chlorantraniliprole, a new anthranilic diamide, is an insecticide that has recently been registered in Brazil to control several lepidopterans, including the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L). Chemical control of this pest has been particularly difficult because of its evolution of resistance to previous insecticide classes. To deploy a chlorantraniliprole resistance-monitoring program, the susceptibility of P. xylostella populations from different regions of Brazil was assessed using concentration-mortality bioassays before the commercial release of chlorantraniliprole. Mortality data were subjected to Probit analysis to estimate lethal parameters. Dosing by immersion or by spraying in a Potter tower were both suitable but topical application was not. All of the P. xylostella populations were highly susceptible to chlorantraniliprole (LC50 0.015-0.056 mg a.i./l of water) with those from the Northeast being the most tolerant. LC99 values were also low (0.065-0.281 mg a.i./l). The susceptibility variation among the populations was notably low, with the highest tolerance ratio being 3.8 fold, indicating a low variability of response among the Brazilian populations to this insecticide. A discriminating concentration of 0.3 mg a.i./l was obtained from the baseline data and proved to be effective for evaluating other populations, causing 100% mortality. The baseline data reflect the natural variation of these P. xylostella populations to chlorantraniliprole, rather than variations caused by previous exposure. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available