4.5 Article

Comparative overwintering host range of three Adelphocoris species (Hemiptera: Miridae) in northern China

Journal

CROP PROTECTION
Volume 30, Issue 11, Pages 1455-1460

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.07.010

Keywords

Adelphocoris suturalis; Adelphocoris lineolatus; Adelphocoris fasciaticollis; Overwintering; Host plant

Categories

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201103012]
  2. Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System Projects

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In northern China, Adelphocoris suturalis, Adelphocoris lineolatus and Adelphocoris fasciaticollis (Hemiptera: Miridae) are common pests of cotton and several other crops. These species have vastly diverse geographic distribution, seasonal dynamics and abundance, the underlying causal factors of which are poorly understood. In this study, the importance of a broad range of plant species as overwintering hosts for each Adelphocoris sp. was compared. Nymphal emergence from a total of 126 plant species was monitored at two distinct locations. The eggs of A. suturalis successfully eclosed from un-plowed cotton field soil and 115 plant species, primarily pastures, weeds and agricultural crops. The eggs of A. lineolatus successfully eclosed from 40 plant species, mainly pastures and weeds. Finally, A. fasciaticollis overwintered on 35 plant species, primarily tree species, weeds and agricultural crops. In conclusion, the most common and widely distributed mind species, A. suturalis, overwintered on a comparatively broader range of plants compared to the other two species. These observations help to understand the differences in geographical distribution and abundance of the three Adelphocoris species, and constitute the basis for forecasting and pest management protocols for Adelphocoris spp. in China. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available