4.1 Article

Ethnic Differences in Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor Val66Met Polymorphism in Croatian and Korean Healthy Participants

Journal

CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages 43-48

Publisher

MEDICINSKA NAKLADA
DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2009.50.43

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Croatian Ministry of Science, Education, and Sports [098-0982522-2455, 098-0982522-2457]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To compare the frequency of alleles and genotypes in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) val(66)met polymorphism in ethnically homogenous Caucasian (from Croatia) and ethnically homogenous Asian (from South Korea) healthy participants, as inter population differences in BDNF val(66)met may be responsible for the divergent findings in genetic and association studies. Methods BDNF val(66)met was genotyped in 800 (556 Croatian and 244 Korean) healthy participants. Frequencies of alleles and genotypes were evaluated using chi(2) test. Results The frequencies for genotypes (chi(2)(2) = 114.69; P < 0.001) and alleles (chi(2)(1) = 120.07; P < 0.001) between Korean and Croatian individuals differed significantly, due to significantly lower (46.3% and 19.5%, P < 0.001) frequency of Met allele and significantly higher (53.7% and 80.5%, P < 0.001) frequency of Val allele in Croatian than in Korean participants. Conclusion The study found significant ethnic differences in BDNF val(66)met polymorphism. The most frequent genotype among Korean participants was Met/Val and they had similar distribution of Met and Val alleles. In contrast, the most frequent genotype among Caucasian participants was Val/Val and they had different distribution of Met and Val alleles. These ethnic differences require matching participants for ethnicity in pharmacogenetic studies and in the studies investigating genetic variations in neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available