4.5 Review

Heat Stress in Wheat during Reproductive and Grain-Filling Phases

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN PLANT SCIENCES
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 491-507

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07352689.2011.615687

Keywords

breeding; genetic engineering; grain-filling; photosynthesis; stay-green; terminal heat stress

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
  2. Australian Endeavour Research Fellowship
  3. University of Western Australia
  4. CSIRO Plant Industry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ambient temperatures have increased since the beginning of the century and are predicted to continue rising under climate change. Such increases in temperature can cause heat stress: a severe threat to wheat production in many countries, particularly when it occurs during reproductive and grain-filling phases. Heat stress reduces plant photosynthetic capacity through metabolic limitations and oxidative damage to chloroplasts, with concomitant reductions in dry matter accumulation and grain yield. Genotypes expressing heat shock proteins are better able to withstand heat stress as they protect proteins from heat-induced damage. Heat tolerance can be improved by selecting and developing wheat genotypes with heat resistance. Wheat pre-breeding and breeding may be based on secondary traits like membrane stability, photosynthetic rate and grain weight under heat stress. Nonetheless, improvement in grain yield under heat stress implies selecting genotypes for grain size and rate of grain filling. Integrating physiological and biotechnological tools with conventional breeding techniques will help to develop wheat varieties with better grain yield under heat stress during reproductive and grain-filling phases. This review discusses the impact of heat stress during reproductive and grain-filling stages of wheat on grain yield and suggests strategies to improve heat stress tolerance in wheat.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available