4.6 Review

Potentially resectable metastatic colorectal cancer: An individualized approach to conversion therapy

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages 218-226

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.05.010

Keywords

Conversion therapy; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal cancer metastases; Metastasectomy; Targeted therapies; Chemotherapy; Resection

Funding

  1. Progetti di Ricerca Rete Oncologia Piemonte - Valle d'Aosta
  2. Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro [AIRC 5X1000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. In recent years, the survival of patients with metastatic disease has improved due to the developments in both medical and surgical care. Patients with technically unresectable metastatic disease could benefit from a multidisciplinary approach for their possible shift toward a technically resectable condition; the choice of the most effective systemic treatment is then crucial to allow conversion to resectability. Systemic conversion therapy may include chemotherapy agents' combinations (fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin), with or without targeted agents (cetuximab, panitumumab, bevacizumab). The choice of the best treatment option has to be evaluated by taking into account each patient's baseline characteristics, biological and pathological information and surgical strategy. In particular, the role of some biologic characteristics of the disease, namely the mutational status of EGFR-pathway oncogenes, is emerging as an important predictive factor of response to anti-EGFR targeted agents. Patients presenting with colorectal cancer metastases should be evaluated for multimodal management with curative intent as the appropriate chemotherapy regimen may induce tumor shrinkage, conversion to resectability and improved survival. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available