4.6 Review

Statins in oncological research: From experimental studies to clinical practice

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages 296-311

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.08.002

Keywords

Statins; Anti-tumor properties; Carcinogenesis; Cancer therapy; Cancer risk reduction; Chemoprevention

Funding

  1. Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic [VEGA 1/0043/12, VEGA 1/0906/14]
  2. European Regional Development Fund Project FNUSA-ICRC [CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0123]
  3. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [GA13-19910S, GBP302/12/G157]
  4. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [7AMB13FR011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Statins, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors are commonly used drugs in the treatment of dyslipidemias, primarily raised cholesterol. Recently, many epidemiological and preclinical studies pointed to anti-tumor properties of statins, including anti-proliferative activities, apoptosis, decreased angiogenesis and metastasis. These processes play an important role in carcinogenesis and, therefore, the role of statins in cancer disease is being seriously discussed among oncologists. Anti-neoplastic properties of statins combined with an acceptable toxicity profile in the majority of individuals support their further development as anti-tumor drugs. The mechanism of action, current preclinical studies and clinical efficacy of statins are reviewed in this paper. Moreover, promising results have been reported regarding the statins' efficacy in some cancer types, especially in esophageal and colorectal cancers, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Statins' hepatotoxicity has traditionally represented an obstacle to the prescription of this class of drugs and this issue is also discussed in this review. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available