4.6 Review

Tumour response prediction by diffusion-weighted MR imaging: Ready for clinical use?

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages 194-207

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.12.008

Keywords

Response prediction; Response monitoring; Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI); DCE-MRI

Funding

  1. Dutch Cancer Society
  2. (KWF) [KUN 2008-4098]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The efficacy of anticancer therapy is usually evaluated by anatomical imaging. However, this method may be suboptimal for the evaluation of novel treatment modalities, such as targeted therapy. Theoretically, functional assessment of tumour response by diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is an attractive tool for this purpose and may allow an early prediction of response. The optimal use of this method has still to be determined. Method: We reviewed the published literature on clinical DWI in the prediction of response to anticancer therapy, especially targeted therapy. Studies investigating the role of DWI in patients with cancer either for response prediction and/or response monitoring were selected for this analysis. Results: We identified 24 studies that met our criteria. Most studies showed a significant correlation between (changes in) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and treatment response. However, in different tumours and studies, both high and low pretreatment ADC were found to be associated with response rate. In the course of treatment, an increase in ADC was associated with response in most cases. Conclusion: The potential of DWI for (early) response monitoring of anticancer therapies has been demonstrated. However, validation is hampered by the lack of reproducibility and standardisation. We recommend that these issues should be properly addressed prior to further testing the clinical use of DWI in the assessment of treatments. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available