4.1 Article

M1 and M2 Macrophages: Oracles of Health and Disease

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 463-488

Publisher

BEGELL HOUSE INC
DOI: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v32.i6.10

Keywords

Cancer; M1; M2; Macrophages; Atherosclerosis; Innate Immunity; Autoimmunity; Stress; Obesity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of immunology is simple. Cure or prevent disease. M1/M2 is useful because it is simple. M1/M2 describes the two major and opposing activities of macrophages. M1 activity inhibits cell proliferation and causes tissue damage while M2 activity promotes cell proliferation and tissue repair. Remarkably, the molecules primarily responsible for these Fight (NO) or Fix (Ornithine) activities both arise from arginine, and via enzymatic pathways (iNOS and arginase) that down regulate each other. The names M1 and M2 were chosen because M1 and M2 macrophages promote Th1 and Th2 responses, respectively. Products of Th1 and Th2 responses (e.g., IEN-gamma, IL-4) also down regulate M2 and M1activity, respectively. Thus, M1/M2 demonstrated the importance of Innate Immunity and how it is linked to Adaptive Immunity in a beautifully counterbalanced system. Civilization and increased longevity present new disease challenges such as cancer and atherosclerosis that do not display classical foreign antigens. And, these diseases are often associated with (or caused by) M1- or M2- type responses that were formerly useful for fighting infections, but now are inappropriate in our increasingly germ-free societies. In turn, there is considerable potential for modulating M1 or M2 Innate responses in modern diseases to achieve better health. Finally, since M1 and Th1 (or M2 and Th2) often work in concert to produce characteristic immune responses and disease pathologies, it is recommended that Immune Type 1 or 2 (IT1, IT2) would be a simpler and unifying terminology going forward.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available