4.7 Review

Structural Design Principles for Delivery of Bioactive Components in Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages 577-606

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408390902841529

Keywords

nutraceuticals; functional foods; delivery systems; structural design; self-assembly; coacervation; micelles; emulsions

Funding

  1. Cooperative State Research, Extension, Education Service, United State Department of Agriculture, Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station [831]
  2. United States Department of Agriculture, CREES, NRI [2005-01357, 2008-02191, 2008-01368]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There have been major advances in the design and fabrication of structured delivery systems for the encapsulation of nutraceutical and functional food components. A wide variety of delivery systems is now available, each with its own advantages and disadvantages for particular applications. This review begins by discussing some of the major nutraceutical and functional food components that need to be delivered and highlights the main limitations to their current utilization within the food industry. It then discusses the principles underpinning the rational design of structured delivery systems: the structural characteristics of the building blocks; the nature of the forces holding these building blocks together; and, the different ways of assembling these building blocks into structured delivery systems. Finally, we review the major types of structured delivery systems that are currently available to food scientists: lipid-based (simple, multiple, multilayer, and solid lipid particle emulsions); surfactant-based (simple micelles, mixed micelles, vesicles, and microemulsions) and biopolymer-based (soluble complexes, coacervates, hydrogel droplets, and particles). For each type of delivery system we describe its preparation, properties, advantages, and limitations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available