4.6 Review

New Trends in Sample Preparation Techniques for Environmental Analysis

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 142-185

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408347.2013.833850

Keywords

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; environmental analyses; microextraction by packed sorbent; on-line solid phase extraction; QuEChERS; sample preparation; solid phase microextraction

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia - FCT [SFRH/BD/64999/2009, SFRH/BD/86939/2012]
  2. CESPU [03-GCQF-CICS-11]
  3. FCT (FLUO-ROPHARMA) [PTDC/EBB-EBI/111699/2009]
  4. CEQUIMED-PEst-OE/SAU/UI4040/2011
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/86939/2012, SFRH/BD/64999/2009] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Environmental samples include a wide variety of complex matrices, with low concentrations of analytes and presence of several interferences. Sample preparation is a critical step and the main source of uncertainties in the analysis of environmental samples, and it is usually laborious, high cost, time consuming, and polluting. In this context, there is increasing interest in developing faster, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly sample preparation techniques. Recently, new methods have been developed and optimized in order to miniaturize extraction steps, to reduce solvent consumption or become solventless, and to automate systems. This review attempts to present an overview of the fundamentals, procedure, and application of the most recently developed sample preparation techniques for the extraction, cleanup, and concentration of organic pollutants from environmental samples. These techniques include: solid phase microextraction, on-line solid phase extraction, microextraction by packed sorbent, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, and QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available