4.6 Article

Effectiveness and Safety of the Awakening and Breathing Coordination, Delirium Monitoring/Management, and Early Exercise/Mobility Bundle

Journal

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 1024-1036

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000129

Keywords

intensive care unit; delirium; Awakening and Breathing Coordination, Delirium monitoring/management, and Early exercise/mobility bundle; ventilator-free days

Funding

  1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Interdisciplinary Nursing Quality Research Initiative
  2. National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [K23AG040157]
  3. Alzheimer's Association
  4. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) Interdisciplinary Nursing Quality Research Initiative (INQRI)
  5. RWJF INQRI
  6. Alzheimer's Association (Co-I on mobile monitoring study)
  7. National Institutes of Health (NIH)-National Institute on Aging (NIA) [5K23AG040157]
  8. NIH
  9. RWJF
  10. NIH [AA008769-20A1]
  11. NIA [AG-027472, AG-035117]
  12. Lilly
  13. National Institute of Mental Health
  14. Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Studies (ADCS)
  15. Forest Laboratories
  16. Astra Zeneca
  17. Vanda Pharmaceuticals
  18. Neosync
  19. Elan/Wyeth/Janssen
  20. Baxter Health Care Corporation
  21. Pfizer
  22. Noven Pharmaceuticals
  23. Novartis
  24. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
  25. NIMH
  26. Baxter
  27. ADCS
  28. Elan/Wyeth
  29. Elan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The debilitating and persistent effects of ICU-acquired delirium and weakness warrant testing of prevention strategies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of implementing the Awakening and Breathing Coordination, Delirium monitoring/management, and Early exercise/mobility bundle into everyday practice. Design: Eighteen-month, prospective, cohort, before-after study conducted between November 2010 and May 2012. Setting: Five adult ICUs, one step-down unit, and one oncology/hematology special care unit located in a 624-bed tertiary medical center. Patients: Two hundred ninety-six patients (146 prebundle and 150 postbundle implementation), who are 19 years old or older, managed by the institutions' medical or surgical critical care service. Interventions: Awakening and Breathing Coordination, Delirium monitoring/management, and Early exercise/mobility bundle. Measurements and Main Results: For mechanically ventilated patients (n = 187), we examined the association between bundle implementation and ventilator-free days. For all patients, we used regression models to quantify the relationship between Awakening and Breathing Coordination, Delirium monitoring/management, and Early exercise/mobility bundle implementation and the prevalence/duration of delirium and coma, early mobilization, mortality, time to discharge, and change in residence. Safety outcomes and bundle adherence were monitored. Patients in the postimplementation period spent three more days breathing without mechanical assistance than did those in the preimplementation period (median [interquartile range], 24 [7-26] vs 21 [0-25]; p = 0.04). After adjusting for age, sex, severity of illness, comorbidity, and mechanical ventilation status, patients managed with the Awakening and Breathing Coordination, Delirium monitoring/management, and Early exercise/mobility bundle experienced a near halving of the odds of delirium (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.93; p = 0.03) and increased odds of mobilizing out of bed at least once during an ICU stay (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.29-3.45; p = 0.003). No significant differences were noted in self-extubation or reintubation rates. Conclusions: Critically ill patients managed with the Awakening and Breathing Coordination, Delirium monitoring/management, and Early exercise/mobility bundle spent three more days breathing without assistance, experienced less delirium, and were more likely to be mobilized during their ICU stay than patients treated with usual care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available