4.6 Article

A multicenter, phased, cluster-randomized controlled trial to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units

Journal

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Volume 40, Issue 11, Pages 2933-2939

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825fd4d8

Keywords

catheter-related infections; evidence-based practice; intensive care units; prevention and control; quality improvement; randomized controlled trial

Funding

  1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Interdisciplinary Nursing Quality Research Initiative
  2. AHRQ
  3. NIH
  4. RAND
  5. Common Wealth Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To determine the causal effects of an intervention proven effective in pre-post studies in reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Design: We conducted a multicenter, phased, cluster-randomized controlled trial in which hospitals were randomized into two groups. The intervention group started in March 2007 and the control group started in October 2007; the study period ended September 2008. Baseline data for both groups are from 2006. Setting: Forty-five intensive care units from 35 hospitals in two Adventist healthcare systems. Interventions: A multifaceted intervention involving evidence-based practices to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections and the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program to improve safety, teamwork, and communication. Measurements and Results: We measured central line-associated bloodstream infections per 1,000 central line days and reported quarterly rates. Baseline average central line-associated bloodstream infections per 1,000 central line days was 4.48 and 2.71, for the intervention and control groups (p=.28), respectively. By October to December 2007, the infection rate declined to 1.33 in the intervention group compared to 2.16 in the control group (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.19; p=.003; 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.57). The intervention group sustained rates <1/1,000 central line days at 19 months (an 81% reduction). The control group also reduced infection rates to <1/1,000 central line days (a 69% reduction) at 12 months. Conclusions: This study demonstrated a causal relationship between the multifaceted intervention and the reduced central line-associated bloodstream infections. Both groups decreased infection rates after implementation and sustained these results over time, replicating the results found in previous, pre-post studies of this multifaceted intervention and providing further evidence that most central line-associated bloodstream infections are preventable. (Crit Care Med 2012; 40: 2933-2939)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available