4.6 Article

Survey of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in critically ill children

Journal

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Volume 39, Issue 7, Pages 1773-1778

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182186ec0

Keywords

venous thromboembolism; anticoagulants; prevention; risk factor; intensive care

Funding

  1. CTSA [UL1 RR024139]
  2. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  3. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: There is lack of evidence to guide thromboprophylaxis in the pediatric intensive care unit. We aimed to assess current prescribing practice for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in critically ill children. Setting: Pediatric intensive care units in the United States and Canada with at least ten beds. Design: Cross-sectional self-administered survey of pediatric intensivists using adolescent, child, and infant scenarios. Participants: Pediatric intensive care unit clinical directors or section heads. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Physician leaders from 97 of 151 (64.2%) pediatric intensive care units or their designees responded to the survey. In mechanically ventilated children, 42.3% of the respondents would usually or always prescribe thromboprophylaxis for the adolescent but only 1.0% would prescribe it for the child and 1.1% for the infant. Considering all pediatric intensive care unit patients, 3.1%, 32.0%, and 44.2% of respondents would never prescribe thromboprophylaxis for the adolescent, child, and infant scenarios, respectively. These find-ings were significant (p <.001 for the adolescent vs. child and infant; p =.002 for child vs. infant). Other patient factors that increased the likelihood of prescribing prophylaxis to a critically ill child for all three scenarios were the presence of hypercoagulability, prior deep venous thrombosis, or a cavopulmonary anastomosis. Prophylaxis was less likely to be prescribed to patients with major bleeding or an anticipated invasive intervention. Low-molecular-weight heparin was the most commonly prescribed drug. Conclusions: In these scenarios, physician leaders in pediatric intensive care units were more likely to prescribe thromboprophylaxis to adolescents compared with children or infants, but they prescribed it less often in adolescents than is recommended by evidence-based guidelines for adults. The heterogeneity in practice we documented underscores the need for rigorous randomized trials to determine the need for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill adolescents and children. (Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 1773-1778)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available