4.6 Article

Can the abdominal perimeter be used as an accurate estimation of intra-abdominal pressure?

Journal

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 316-319

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318192678e

Keywords

abdominal pressure; abdominal perimeter; abdominal hypertension; abdominal compartment syndrome; diagnosis; clinical examination

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is an important parameter and prognostic indicator of the patent's underlying physiologic status. Correct IAP measurement, therefore, is crucial. Most of the direct and indirect techniques are not free from risks and require some time and skills. This study looks at the possibility of using the abdominal perimeter (AP) as a quick estimation for IAP. Methods: In total, 237 paired measurements were performed in 26 intensive care unit patients. The IAP was measured according to the recommendations of the World Society on Abdominal Compartment Syndrome via an indwelling bladder catheter using a pressure transducer. The AP was defined as the abdominal circumference at its largest point using body marks as reference for consecutive measurements. Results: The male:female ratio was 1:1, age 69.8 +/- 15.2 yrs, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 11 score 26.5 +/- 9.2, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score 11 score 58 +/- 15.5. The number of measurements in each patient was 9.4 +/- 4.6. The IAP was 10.8 +/- 4.9 mm Hg, and the AP was 101 +/- 19.2 cm. There was a poor but statistically significant correlation between IAP and AP: AP = 1.8 x IAP + 81.6 (R-2 = 0.21, p = 0.04), but the bias was considerable. The correlation was somewhat better between Delta IAP (the difference between two consecutive IAP measurements) and Delta AP (the difference between two consecutive AP measurements) in 210 paired measurements: Delta AP = 0.4 x Delta IAP + 0.1 (if = 0.24, p < 0.0001). The analysis according to Bland and Altman showed that Delta IAP was almost identical to Delta AP with a mean difference or bias of 0 +/- 3 (95% confidence interval: -0.4 to 0.4); however, the limits of agreement were large and thus reflect poor agreement Conclusions: In view of the poor correlation between IAP and AP, the latter cannot be used as a clinical estimate for IAP. The correlation between Delta AP and Delta AP was somewhat better, meaning that Delta AP can be used as an estimate of the evolution of IAP over time; however, for making a definite diagnosis of intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome, the exact value of IAP needs to be measured. (Crit Care Med 2009; 37:316-319)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available