4.6 Article

Identification of interleukin-6 promoter polymorphisms in the Chinese Han population and their functional significance

Journal

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 1437-1443

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31816a0adb

Keywords

interleukin-6; gene polymorphisms; sepsis; trauma; human

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pivotal cytokine in both innate and adaptive immunity. Several polymorphisms in the IL-6 promoter have been reported in Western populations. However, little is known about their occurrence in the Chinese population. The functionality of IL-6 promoter polymorphisms remains controversial. Design: Genetic, functional, and association studies. Setting. National key laboratory of trauma and departments of traumatic surgery in two teaching hospitals. Subjects. A total of 348 healthy blood donors and 105 patients with major trauma. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Identification of polymorphisms in the IL-6 promoter was performed using sequencing and restriction fragment length polymorphism methods. Their functionality was assessed by observation of transcription activity, IL-6 production, and their clinical relevance in 105 patients with major trauma. Only one variant (C-572G) was identified in IL-6 promoter in Chinese Han population. This polymorphism was associated with IL-6 production by peripheral leukocytes in response to ex vivo lipopolysaccharide stimulation in an alleledose-dependent effect. The C-->G variation at position -572 could reduce transcriptional activity of the IL-6 promoter as shown in both U-937 and K562 cell lines. Moreover, the -572 polymorphism was associated with lower risk of sepsis in major trauma patients. Conclusions: The -572 polymorphism, a unique variation in the IL-6 promoter in the Chinese Han population, may be used as a relevant risk estimate for sepsis in trauma patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available