4.3 Article

Current Sedation Practices: Lessons Learned from International Surveys

Journal

CRITICAL CARE CLINICS
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 471-+

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2009.04.001

Keywords

Critical care; Survey; Sedation; Analgesia; Delirium; Protocol; Daily interruption

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patient outcomes are significantly influenced by the choice of sedative and analgesic agents, the presence of over- or undersedation, poor pain control, and delirium. Individualized sedation management using sedation assessment tools, sedation protocols, and daily sedative interruption can improve clinical outcomes. Despite the publication of randomized trials and numerous guidelines, the uptake of proven strategies into routine practice can be slow. Surveys of clinicians' self-reported practice and prospective practice audits characterize sedation and analgesia practices and provide directions for education and future research. The objective of this review is to present the findings of surveys and practice audits, evaluating the management of sedation and analgesia in mechanically ventilated adults in the intensive care unit, and to summarize international critical care sedation practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available