4.6 Article

fMIRI reveals a lower visual field preference for hand actions in human superior parieto-occipital cortex (SPOC) and precuneus

Journal

CORTEX
Volume 49, Issue 9, Pages 2525-2541

Publisher

ELSEVIER MASSON
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.014

Keywords

Grasping; Brain; Vision; Visuomotor control; Parietal lobe

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP84293]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada
  3. Portuguese Foundation of Science and Technology and Social European Fund [SFRH/BPD/65951/2009]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/65951/2009] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Humans are more efficient when performing actions towards objects presented in the lower visual field (VF) than in the upper VF. The present study used slow event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine whether human brain areas implicated in action would show such VF preferences. Participants were asked to fixate one of four different positions allowing objects to be presented in the upper left, upper right, lower left or lower right VF. In some trials they reached to grasp the object with the right hand while in others they passively viewed the object. Crucially, by manipulating the fixation position, rather than the position of the objects, the biomechanics of the movements did not differ across conditions. The superior parieto-occipital cortex (SPOC) and the left precuneus, brain areas implicated in the control of reaching, were significantly more activated when participants grasped objects presented in the lower VF relative to the upper VF. Importantly, no such VF preferences were observed in these regions during passive viewing. This finding fits well with evidence from the macaque neurophysiology that neurons within visuomotor regions over-represent the lower VF relative to the upper VF and indicate that the neural responses within these regions may reflect a functional lower VF advantage during visually-guided actions. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available