4.6 Article

Improved multitasking following prefrontal tDCS

Journal

CORTEX
Volume 49, Issue 10, Pages 2845-2852

Publisher

ELSEVIER MASSON
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.08.015

Keywords

Posterior lateral prefrontal cortex; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Response selection; Multitasking; Bottleneck

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery grant [DP110102925]
  2. ARC-SRI Science of Learning Research Centre [SR120300015]
  3. ARC APD [DP0986387]
  4. ARC Future Fellowship [FT120100033]
  5. ARC Australian Laureate Fellowship [FL110100103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have a limited capacity for mapping sensory information onto motor responses. This processing bottleneck is thought to be a key factor in determining our ability to make two decisions simultaneously i.e., to multitask (Pashler, 1984, 1994; Welford, 1952). Previous functional imaging research (Dux, Ivanoff, Asplund, & Marois, 2006; Dux et al., 2009) has localised this bottleneck to the posterior lateral prefrontal cortex (pLPFC) of the left hemisphere. Currently, however, it is unknown whether this region is causally involved in multitasking performance. We investigated the role of the left pLPFC in multitasking using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The behavioural paradigm included single- and dual-task trials, each requiring a speeded discrimination of visual stimuli alone, auditory stimuli alone, or both visual and auditory stimuli. Reaction times for single- and dual-task trials were compared before, immediately after, and 20 min after anodal stimulation (excitatory), cathodal stimulation (inhibitory), or sham stimulation. The cost of responding to the two tasks (i.e., the reduction in performance for dual- us single-task trials) was significantly reduced by cathodal stimulation, but not by anodal or sham stimulation. Overall, the results provide direct evidence that the left pLPFC is a key neural locus of the central bottleneck that limits an individual's ability to make two simple decisions simultaneously. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available