4.6 Article

Decline in motor prediction in elderly subjects: Right versus left arm differences in mentally simulated motor actions

Journal

CORTEX
Volume 44, Issue 9, Pages 1271-1278

Publisher

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.07.008

Keywords

aging; human; motor imagery; motor prediction; movement duration; right and left arm

Funding

  1. Conseil Regional de Bourgogne
  2. INSERM
  3. CNRS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effects of age upon the temporal features of executed and imagined movements performed with the dominant (D; right) and nondominant (ND; left) arms. Thirty right-handed subjects were divided into two groups: (i) the young group (n = 15; mean age: 22.5 +/- 2.5 years) and (ii) the elderly group (n = 15; mean age: 70.2 +/- 2.2 years). The motor task, involving arm pointing movements among four pairs of targets (.5 cm, 1 cm, 1.5 cm and 2 cm), imposed strong spatiotemporal constraints. During overt performance, young and elderly subjects modulated movement duration according to the size of targets, despite the fact that movement speed decreased with age as well as in the left arm compared with the right. This observation was also valid for the covert performance produced by the young group. However, such a strong relationship between covert movement durations and target size was not as obvious in the elderly group. Young, compared to elderly subjects, showed stronger correlations and smaller absolute differences between executed and imagined movements for both arms. Additionally, the absolute difference between executed and imagined arm movement durations was more pronounced for the left than the right arm in aged subjects. This result suggests a selective decline with age of mental prediction of motor actions, which is more prominent when the ND arm is involved. (C) 2007 Elsevier Srl. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available