Journal
CORROSION
Volume 64, Issue 11, Pages 824-835Publisher
NATL ASSOC CORROSION ENG
DOI: 10.5006/1.3279916
Keywords
Alloy 600; nickel-based alloys; stress corrosion cracking; surface preparation
Funding
- BNFL/Westinghouse
- NSERC Senior Industrial Research Chair in Nuclear Engineering
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In the literature it is a common belief that electropolishing mitigates primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC) because it removes superficial cold work. Here, it is shown that electropolished Alloy 600 (UNS N06600) exposed to hydrogenated steam undergoes internal Cr oxidation, whereas mechanical polishing induces external oxidation. This has implications for SCC initiation, which has been tested with different surface preparations (electropolishing and mechanical polishing) using reverse-U-bend (RUB) and C-ring samples. The results show a systematic trend that mechanically polished surfaces are more resistant to stress corrosion cracking (SCC) than electropolished surfaces. The mechanism involved in this increased resistance is thought to he related to short-circuit diffusion of Cr to the surface, which promotes external rather than internal oxidation. The role of compressive stress induced by mechanical polishing is a less-likely explanation of the observed effects. Mechanical polishing does not suppress PWSCC completely because if the external oxide layer breaks, the exposed material may continue to oxidize internally.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available