4.4 Article

Preoperative Graft Thickness Measurements Do Not Influence Final BSCVA or Speed of Vision Recovery After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

Journal

CORNEA
Volume 32, Issue 11, Pages 1423-1427

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a40689

Keywords

Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty; corneal donor graft thickness; graft thickness

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose:To evaluate the influence of preoperative graft thickness (GT) on final visual acuity and speed of vision recovery after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).Methods:The best spectacle-corrected acuity (BSCVA) was measured after DSAEK was performed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. A regression analysis was performed to determine whether GT predicted the BSCVA across each time gate. The time to achieve the 1-year maximum BSCVA was determined to assess the speed of recovery for all eyes that had data at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Additionally, the final BSCVA was compared between 2 distinct groups of thin (<125-m) versus thick (>165-m) tissue.Results:There were 144 eyes evaluated. No significant correlations were found between the GT and the BSCVA at any of the time gates: 1, 3, 6, 12, or 24 months. Speed of vision recovery was not affected by the GT. The average GT values of the eyes that achieved BSCVA by 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year were not significantly different and were 154.7, 141.3, 149, and 150.1 m, respectively. No difference was found between the BSCVA of thick versus thin tissues at any of the time gates: 1, 3, 6, or 12 months.Conclusions:Preoperative GT measurements were not correlated with the BSCVA after the DSAEK was performed at 1, 6, 12, or 24 months postoperatively and do not determine the speed of vision recovery. Additionally, no difference was found in postoperative vision outcomes when directly comparing tissues at either end of the GT spectrum of this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available