4.4 Article

The New Therapeutic Concept of Using a Rho Kinase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction

Journal

CORNEA
Volume 30, Issue -, Pages S54-S59

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182281ee1

Keywords

corneal endothelial cells; Rho kinase; ROCK inhibitor; wound healing

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency [AS2111180G]
  2. Cabinet Office in Japan [LS117]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Corneal endothelial cells (CECs) show poor regenerative ability in humans, and noncompensatory damage of CECs causes irreversible corneal haziness in cases of bullous keratopathy. Although corneal transplantations provide considerable clinical benefits, allograft rejection, primary graft failure, and the shortage of donor corneas are problems that still need to be overcome. The establishment of new treatment therapies is the key to solving these problems, and we have attempted to establish a new clinical intervention for corneal endothelial dysfunction. We previously demonstrated that the inhibition of Rho/Rho kinase (ROCK) signaling by Y-27632, a specific ROCK inhibitor, promoted cell adhesion, inhibited apoptosis, and enhanced cell proliferation in cultured primate CECs. These results raise the possibility that the ROCK inhibitor might serve as a new tool for establishing an effective culture method for newly emerging cultivated CEC transplantation therapies. Moreover, because Y-27632 enhances cell proliferation in vitro, we hypothesized that the use of a ROCK inhibitor could be a new pharmacological intervention for the treatment of corneal endothelial dysfunction. We demonstrated that the topical instillation of a ROCK inhibitor promotes corneal endothelium wound healing in an animal model. This indicates that use of a ROCK inhibitor is a less invasive and novel therapy that should prove promising for the treatment of corneal endothelial dysfunction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available