4.1 Article

The COPD Assessment Test (CAT): Short- and Medium-term Response to Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Journal

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/15412555.2012.671869

Keywords

COPD; Pulmonary Rehabilitation; Quality of Life; Health Status; COPD Assessment Test (CAT); Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist Award
  2. Medical Research Council (UK) New Investigator Research Grant
  3. Medical Research Council
  4. Biomedical Research Unit
  5. Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK)
  6. MRC [G1002113, G0701628] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Medical Research Council [G0701628, G1002113] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. National Institute for Health Research [DHCS/07/07/009] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background : The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is a recently introduced instrument to assess health-related quality of life in COPD. We aimed to evaluate the longitudinal change in CAT following Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR), and test the relationship between CAT and CRQ-Self Report (SR) over time. We hypothesised that the CAT would show similar responsiveness to PR as the CRQ-SR both in the short and medium-term. Methods: 118 COPD patients completed an eight-week outpatient multidisciplinary PR programme. CAT, CRQ-SR and the incremental shuttle walk (ISW) were measured prior to starting PR (T1), completion of PR (T2) and 6 months after completion of PR (T3). Results: There was a significant improvement in CAT, CRQ-SR and ISW immediately following PR (p < 0.001). Although there was decline between T2 and T3, CAT, CRQ-SR and ISW remained significantly better at T3 compared with T1 (ANOVA p < 0.001). Both between T1-T2 and between T2-T3, change in CAT correlated significantly with change in CRQ (both r = -0.44 and p < 0.001). The slope of the relationship between CAT change and CRQ-SR change at T1-T2 and T2-T3 was not significantly different (ANCOVA: intercept p = 0.79, interaction effect p = 0.95). Conclusions: In COPD, the CAT score is immediately responsive to PR and remains improved at 6 months. There is no significant difference in the short and medium term changes in the CAT and CRQ-SR following PR. We propose that for most clinical indications for assessing health-related quality of life in COPD, the CAT is a robust and practical alternative to longer-established instruments such as the CRQ-SR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available