4.8 Review

Strategies to improve metal organic frameworks photocatalyst's performance for degradation of organic pollutants

Journal

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
Volume 376, Issue -, Pages 449-466

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.08.005

Keywords

Metal-organic framework; Photocatalyst; Modified strategy; Organic pollutant degradation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51521006, 51378190, 51278176, 51408206, 51579098, 51879101, 51579096, 51508177]
  2. National Program for Support of Top-Notch Young Professionals of China (2014)
  3. program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0186]
  4. Hunan Provincial Education Department [521293050]
  5. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT-13R17]
  6. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project [2016RS3026]
  7. International SAMP
  8. T Cooperation Program of China [2015DFG92750]
  9. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2015JJ2031]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researches on metal-organic framework (MOF) materials have gathered increasing interest in the field of photocatalysis due to their large surface area, well-ordered porous structure, and tunable organic bridging linker/metal clusters with a tailorable capacity to absorb light. The development of inexpensive, stable, efficient, and band-gap tunable MOF-based photocatalysts is still a great challenge. The selection of central metal ions and organic ligands is of great importance for the fabrication of MOFs with excellent photocatalytic properties. This review aimed to summarize the strategies of improving photocatalytic activity under light illumination, including optimization, modification, doping and imperfection, mainly in structure, light absorption, band gap and stability. In addition, the applications of various modified MOFs are also introduced. Finally, the future developments of MOFs are discussed. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available