4.8 Review

Luminescent biodetection based on lanthanide-doped inorganic nanoprobes

Journal

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
Volume 273, Issue -, Pages 13-29

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.11.017

Keywords

Lanthanide; Luminescent biodetection; Nanoprobe; Analyte; Disease marker

Funding

  1. 863 and 973 programs of MOST [2011AA03A407, 2014CB845605]
  2. Special Project of National Major Scientific Equipment Development of China [2012YQ120060]
  3. NSFC [51002151, 51102234, 11104266, 11204302, 21201163, 11304314, U1305244, 21325104]
  4. Scientific Equipment Development Project of CAS [YZ201210]
  5. Strategic Priority Research Program of the CAS [XDA09030307]
  6. Chunmiao Project of Haixi Institute of Chinese Academy of Sciences [CMZX-2014-003]
  7. Key Project of Science and Technology Foundation of Fujian Province [2011HZ0001-2, 2013H0060]
  8. NSF of Fujian Province for Young Scientists [2012J05106, 2011J05145]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sensitive and selective biodetection is essential for many applications in biology and medicine, including protein purification, DNA immunoassay, early cancer diagnosis and therapeutics. Lanthanide-doped inorganic nanoprobes, emerging as an alternative to conventional molecular luminescent probes by overcoming their current limitations, have attracted a reviving interest for a variety of bioapplications due to their distinct optical properties. In this review, we focus on the most recent progress on the development of lanthanide-doped luminescent nano-bioprobes and their biodetection of model analytes, nucleic acids, ions, and disease markers both in vivo and in vitro. In particular, we highlight the typical bioconjugation strategies and detection techniques for different target analytes. Finally, some most important emerging trends and future efforts toward this rapidly growing field are also proposed. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available