4.8 Review

Probing the binding sites and coordination limits of buckybowls in a solvent-free environment: Experimental and theoretical assessment

Journal

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
Volume 254, Issue 17-18, Pages 2234-2246

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.05.004

Keywords

Open geodesic polyarenes; Buckybowls; Fullerene fragments; Metal complexation; Metal-pi-arene interactions

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-CAREER-0546945]
  2. University at Albany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work overviews the coordination properties of fullerene fragments or buckybowls, a new class of open geodesic polyaromatic hydrocarbons that map onto the surface of fullerenes but lack their full closure. In contrast to fullerenes, the bowl-shaped polyarenes have both the convex and concave unsaturated carbon surfaces open and available for coordination, which makes them unique and interesting pi-ligands for metal binding reactions. Variable synthetic methods based on solution and solid-state reactions have been developed to access transition metal complexes of buckybowls and to reveal their coordination properties. These studies have been mainly focused on the smallest fragments of the C-60-fullerene, corannulene (C20H10) and sumanene (C21H12). In order to utilize directional metal-pi-arene interactions effectively and to differentiate pi-bonding sites of buckybowls, we have introduced a micro-scale gas-phase deposition method. We have proven this technique to be very effective for the preparation of metal complexes of buckybowls in a single crystalline form. Plus, it allowed us to expand the coordination studies to larger bowls, including dibenzo[a,g]corannulene (C28H14), monoindenocorannulene (C26H12), and the C-3-symmetric hemifullerene (C30H12). Specifically, several dimetal core complexes of varied electrophilicity have been used in the gas-phase coordination reactions to identify the preferential binding sites and to test the coordination limits of pi-bowls in a solvent-free environment. The coordination preferences of several buckybowls having different surface area and bowl depth, as well as different curvature and strain are compared and discussed here based on the results of X-ray diffraction and DFT calculation studies. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available