4.4 Article

Immunogenic properties of Landrace pigs selected for resistance to mycoplasma pneumonia of swine

Journal

ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL
Volume 87, Issue 3, Pages 321-329

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/asj.12440

Keywords

disease resistance; immunogenic properties; mycoplasma pneumonia lesions; pig

Funding

  1. Program for Promotion of Basic and Applied Research for Innovations in Bio-oriented Industry
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K15021, 26660287, 26252064, 15H04586] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mycoplasma pneumonia of swine (MPS) lung lesions and immunogenic properties were compared between a Landrace line that was genetically selected for reduced incidence of pulmonary MPS lesions, and a non-selected Landrace line. The MPS-selected Landrace line showed significantly lower degrees of pulmonary MPS lesions compared with the non-selected Landrace line. When changes in immunity before and after vaccination were compared, the percentage of B cells in the peripheral blood of the MPS-selected Landrace line was significantly lower than that of the non-selected line. Furthermore, the concentration of growth hormone and the mitogen activity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the MPS-selected Landrace line showed significantly (P<0.05) lower increases after vaccination than the non-selected line. Conversely, the concentration of peripheral blood interferon (IFN)- and salivary immunoglobulin A (IgA) after Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae vaccination was significantly higher in the MPS-selected Landrace line than in the non-selected line. Gene expression of toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 was significantly higher in the MPS-selected Landrace line in immune tissues, with the exception of the hilar lymph nodes. The present results suggest that peripheral blood IFN-, salivary IgA TLR2, and TLR4 are important immunological factors influencing the development of MPS lesions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available