4.5 Article

Currents and sediment transport in the Mississippi Canyon and effects of Hurricane Georges

Journal

CONTINENTAL SHELF RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 11-12, Pages 1384-1396

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2009.03.002

Keywords

Currents; Mississippi Canyon; Sediment transport; Hurricane; Resuspension

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF [OCE-9023916]
  2. Department of Oceanography, Texas AM University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The temporal variability in currents, temperature, and particulate matter concentration were measured in the Mississippi Canyon axis where the thalweg was 300 m deep from May-July and August-November 1998 using current meters, thermographs, a light-scattering sensor, and sediment traps. Canyon sediments were sampled by coring and observed using an ROV video camera. Currents in the upper Mississippi Canyon generally oscillated up/down canyon with diurnal periodicity and were bottom-intensified. Mean current speed at 3.5 mab was approximately 8 cm s(-1) during both deployments, reaching maximum speeds of over 50 cm s(-1) under normal conditions. Based on current velocities, critical bed shear stress for resuspension of canyon-floor sediments was exceeded about 30% of the time during both deployments. In late September, Hurricane Georges passed 150 km NE of the study site, significantly intensifying current velocities, bed shear stress, resuspension, trap fluxes and temperature fluctuations. As the hurricane passed, maximum current speed reached 68 cm(-s) and temperature decreased similar to 7 degrees C in less than two hours. Critical bed shear stress for sediment resuspension was exceeded approximately 50% of the time during the five days of hurricane influence. Further evidence for sediment resuspension was the five-fold (and perhaps 70-130 fold) increase in trap fluxes and compositional similarities between canyon surface sediment and material collected by traps. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available