4.5 Article

Influence of tumour necrosis factor-alpha polymorphism-308 and atopy on irritant contact dermatitis in healthcare workers

Journal

CONTACT DERMATITIS
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages 320-332

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01778.x

Keywords

barrier repair; healthcare workers; irritant contact dermatitis; neurosensory irritation; polymorphism-308; stratum corneum; tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)

Funding

  1. Medline Industries, Inc., Mundelein, IL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Chronic irritant hand dermatitis is an issue for healthcare workers and may negatively impact infection control. Objectives. We examined the effects of a G to A transition at position -308 on the tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) gene on chronically damaged skin of healthcare workers during exposure and recovery from repetitive hand hygiene, after intensive treatment, and on the irritant response in normal skin. Patients/Materials/Methods. In 68 healthcare workers with irritant hand dermatitis, we genotyped TNF-alpha -308 and measured the epidermal response via quantitative digital imaging, erythema, dryness, and barrier integrity. Results. Excess hand erythema decreased with hand hygiene exposure and increased during time off for AA/GA genotypes, but had opposite effects for GG. AA/GA had smaller reductions in dryness with lotion treatment and larger reductions in excess erythema than GG. The atopic diathesis and heightened neurosensory irritation resulting from water and lactic acid significantly influenced the responses. Repeated exposure to water and sodium lauryl sulfate (0.05, 0.1%) produced higher erythema in normal skin for AA/GA than for GG. Conclusions. This study provides evidence that the TNF-alpha polymorphism at -308 and an atopic history impact the severity of irritation and recovery from exposure and response to treatment for common hand skin products in both chronic irritant hand dermatitis and normal skin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available