4.7 Article

Experimental study of magnesia and M/P ratio influencing properties of magnesium phosphate cement

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages 177-183

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.136

Keywords

MPC; Magnesia; Calcination; Performance; Microstructure mechanism

Funding

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [8100001]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0605]
  3. Program for scientific research and development by China Railway Corporation [2013G008-F]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnesium phosphate cement (MPC) is prepared by mixing MgO powder (M) with KH2PO4 powder (P) and borax powder (B). To investigate the influence of calcined magnesia on the compressive and flexural strength of MPC, two types of magnesia were calcinated under different temperatures, and the chemical and physical properties were analysed. The MPC was prepared by mixing calcinated magnesia with fly ash and retarder. The selection principle of magnesia was proposed to optimise the physical and chemical properties of the MPC. The experimental results demonstrate that the increasing calcination temperature led to the increasing particle size of the magnesia. The calcination temperature had a significant influence on the light magnesia and had no effect on its chemical composition. The compressive and flexural strength of the MPC was tested, and its microstructure was analysed using XRD and SEM methods. The testing results demonstrate that within a certain range, the compressive strength increased with an increasing calcination temperature. The compressive strength was the maximum when the mole ratio of phosphate to MgO was 1/4-1/5. In a certain range, as the P/M decreased, the flexural strength of the MPC increased and subsequently remained at a certain level. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available