4.7 Article

Evaluation of using waste timber railway sleepers in wood-cement composite materials

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 126-129

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.016

Keywords

Timber railway sleeper; Construction material; Wood-cement composite; Physico-mechanical properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In present study, the suitability of using waste timber railway sleepers (WTRSs) as filler in wood-cement composites was investigated. The effects of two variable factors namely press temperatures (25 and 60 degrees C) and calcium chloride contents (3%, 5% and 7% w/w cement) on some physico-mechanical properties were also investigated. The following experimental parameters were constant: wood/cement ratio (40:60), board thickness (15 mm), press pressure (40 kg/cm(2)), and press time (5 min). Press temperature, calcium chloride and the interaction of both variables had significant effects (p < 0.01) on all the studied properties. Test results showed that addition of calcium chloride tends to enhance both the physical and mechanical properties of boards. All properties of the boards were improved when the calcium chloride content was increased from 3% to 7%. The results also showed that as the press temperature was increased from 25 to 60 degrees C, significant increased in water absorption and thickness swelling occurred. Water absorption and thickness swelling (at 2 h and 24 h) compared favorably with values reported for cement-bonded composites produced from virgin wood particles. In general, the strength properties of the boards were found to be a maximum when press temperature and calcium chloride were 25 degrees C and 7%, respectively. These properties can be exploited in many applications where lightweight concretes are required. Therefore, WTRS is technically suitable for building construction such as paneling, ceiling and partitioning. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available