4.3 Review

Which provenance and where? Seed sourcing strategies for revegetation in a changing environment

Journal

CONSERVATION GENETICS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 1-10

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-012-0425-z

Keywords

Climate change; Habitat fragmentation; Inbreeding; Local adaptation; Outbreeding depression; Plant genetic resources; Revegetation

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LP110200805]
  2. South Australian Premier's Science and Research Fund
  3. NCCARF
  4. Native Vegetation Council of South Australia [09/10/27]
  5. Nature Foundation SA Inc.
  6. Australian Geographic Society
  7. Biological Society of South Australia
  8. Field Naturalist Society of South Australia
  9. Wildlife Preservation Society of Australia
  10. Australian Research Council [LP110200805] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Revegetation is one practical application of science that should ideally aim to combine ecology with evolution to maximise biodiversity and ecosystem outcomes. The strict use of locally sourced seed in revegetation programs is widespread and is based on the expectation that populations are locally adapted. This practice does not fully integrate two global drivers of ecosystem change and biodiversity loss: habitat fragmentation and climate change. Here, we suggest amendments to existing strategies combined with a review of alternative seed-sourcing strategies that propose to mitigate against these drivers. We present a provenancing selection guide based on confidence surrounding climate change distribution modelling and data on population genetic and/or environmental differences between populations. Revegetation practices will benefit from greater integration of current scientific developments and establishment of more long-term experiments is key to improving the long-term success. The rapid growth in carbon and biodiversity markets creates a favourable economic climate to achieve these outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available