4.3 Article

Genetic signatures of population change in the British golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos)

Journal

CONSERVATION GENETICS
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 1837-1846

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-010-0076-x

Keywords

Golden eagle; Aquila chrysaetos; Microsatellite; Population genetics; MSVAR

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council, UK
  2. University of Nottingham
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NBAF010001] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [NBAF010001] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) was once widely distributed in the uplands of the British Isles, but is now extinct in Ireland, and largely confined to the highlands and islands of Scotland. As the precise extent and severity of the reduction in population size are unclear, it is important to understand how the population was affected by the decline. We therefore genotyped 13 polymorphic microsatellite loci in 172 individuals from the contemporary British population and compared their genetic diversity to 70 British and 9 Irish museum specimens. Despite the recent population decline, there is only slight evidence for a concomitant loss of genetic variation. Instead, two likelihood-based Bayesian methods provided evidence for a severe ancient genetic bottleneck, possibly caused by the fragmentation of a large mainland European population and/or the founding effects of colonising the British Isles. As the population persisted despite this ancient bottleneck, our conclusion is that there is limited need for intervention to augment the present-day genetic diversity. The main short-term objective of conservation measures should be to increase population sizes by continuous safeguarding of individuals and habitat management. Finally, we also confirmed that, for management purposes, the species should be considered a single population unit and that the extinct Irish population was not differentiated from the British one.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available