4.3 Article

Molecular assessment of population differentiation and individual assignment potential of Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) populations

Journal

CONSERVATION GENETICS
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 1435-1443

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-009-9970-5

Keywords

Nile crocodile; Crocodylus niloticus; Genetic variation; Population divergence; Management units; African biogeography

Funding

  1. United States Environmental Protection Agency
  2. American Museum of Natural History
  3. Center for Environmental Research and Conservation (CERC) at Columbia University
  4. Disney Conservation Fund
  5. National Geographic Television
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences
  7. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1126516] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conservation and management of widespread species can be improved if populations exhibiting genetic differentiation are recognized as local management units. Specimens of Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) corresponding to major river drainage systems from Eastern Africa and Madagascar, and a small set of samples from Western Africa, were analyzed using multilocus genotyping to evaluate the potential to discriminate among locations and to assign individuals to population of origin. Populations from all sampled regions exhibited marked levels of genetic and genotypic differentiation as assessed by significant F (ST) values and Bayesian analysis of population structure. At the regional level, the majority (94%) of all specimens were successfully assigned to the population of origin using only four microsatellite loci. Three populations sampled within Madagascar required the use of 12 loci for successful assignment of greater than 84%. Our findings demonstrate a need for alternative management strategies that consider the biogeographic sub-structuring of Nile crocodiles associated with major river drainages in Africa and Madagascar.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available