4.6 Article

Extirpation of Macroalgae (Sargassum spp.) on the Subtropical East Australian Coast

Journal

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 913-921

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01727.x

Keywords

biodiversity loss; conservation status; extinction; Fucales; habitat loss; IUCN Red List; Phaeophyta; population loss

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Populations of large brown algae of the Laminariales and Fucales (Phaeophyta) have declined or been extirpated from many locations on temperate coasts worldwide. We conducted field surveys and a literature review, and examined herbarium specimens, through which we discovered previously unreported extirpations of large brown algal species from a tropical and subtropical coastline. Sargassum amaliae, S. aquifolium, S. carpophyllum, S. polycystum, and S. spinifex were common habitat-forming macroalgae that supported diverse assemblages of invertebrates and smaller algae before urbanization began in 1970 along the 45-km length of Sunshine Coast in Queensland, Australia. Causes of these extirpations are not known, but are consistent with losses of other large brown algal species from coastal areas undergoing urbanization or eutrophication. Sargassum spp. do not have the characteristics thought to protect marine species from extinction (large geographical ranges, occurrence on many different substrata, long-distance dispersal). Some local Sargassum spp. are endemic to eastern Australia. Abundance of Sargassum is limited by suitable substrata on the sandy southern Queensland coast (370 km). These substrata are 12 rocky headlands separated by long (5-105 km) sandy beaches. Most multicellular propagules (the only motile stage in Sargassum) settle within 1-3 m of parental thalli, which restricts long-distance dispersal needed to maintain connectivity among populations and to recolonize areas of the headlands from which populations have been extirpated. Local Sargassum spp. could be categorized as data deficient by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), but the IUCN vulnerable category is more accurate given extirpations, limited habitat, and the lack of connectivity among populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available