4.6 Article

Joint Effects of Inbreeding and Local Adaptation on the Evolution of Genetic Load after Fragmentation

Journal

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 1618-1627

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01326.x

Keywords

fragmentation; genetic load; genetic rescue; inbreeding; local adaptation; migration; outbreeding depression

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Research
  2. CNRS
  3. European Union Fifth Framework
  4. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-05-BDIV-014]
  5. John Simon Guggenheim Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Disruption of gene flow among demes after landscape fragmentation can facilitate local adaptation but increase the effect of genetic drift and inbreeding. The joint effects of these conflicting forces on the mean fitness of individuals in a population are unknown. Through simulations, we explored the effect of increased isolation on the evolution of genetic load over the short and long term when fitness depends in part on local adaptation. We ignored genetic effects on demography. We modeled complex genomes, where a subset of the loci were under divergent selection in different localities. When a fraction of the loci were under heterogeneous selection, isolation increased mean fitness in larger demes made up of hundreds of individuals because of improved local adaptation. In smaller demes of tens of individuals, increased isolation improved local adaptation very little and reduced overall fitness. Short-term improvement of mean fitness after fragmentation may not be indicative of the long-term evolution of fitness. Whatever the deme size and potential for local adaptation, migration of one or two individuals per generation minimized the genetic load in general. The slow dynamics of mean fitness following fragmentation suggests that conservation measures should be implemented before the consequences of isolation on the genetic load become of concern.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available