Journal
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 225-229Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01066.x
Keywords
conservation planning; metapopulation; population viability analysis; sensitivity analysis; uncertainty
Funding
- Species at Risk Recovery Education
- Parks Canada
- British Columbia Ministry of Environment
- Centre for Applied Conservation Research
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council postdoctoral fellowship
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Population viability analysis (PVA) is an effective framework for modeling species- and habitat-recovery efforts, but uncertainty in parameter estimates and model structure can lead to unreliable predictions. Integrating complex and often uncertain information into spatial PVA models requires that comprehensive sensitivity analyses be applied to explore the influence of spatial and nonspatial parameters on model predictions. We reviewed 87 analyses of spatial demographic PVA models of plants and animals to identify common approaches to sensitivity analysis in recent publications. In contrast to best practices recommended in the broader modeling community, sensitivity analyses of spatial PVAs were typically ad hoc, inconsistent, and difficult to compare. Most studies applied local approaches to sensitivity analyses, but few varied multiple parameters simultaneously. A lack of standards for sensitivity analysis and reporting in spatial PVAs has the potential to compromise the ability to learn collectively from PVA results, accurately interpret results in cases where model relationships include nonlinearities and interactions, prioritize monitoring and management actions, and ensure conservation-planning decisions are robust to uncertainties in spatial and nonspatial parameters. Our review underscores the need to develop tools for global sensitivity analysis and apply these to spatial PVA.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available