4.7 Article

Research on high creative application of case-based reasoning system on engineering design

Journal

COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages 90-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2012.10.006

Keywords

CBR; Engineering design; Semantic understanding

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51075262, 50575142, 50775140, 60304015]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB707503]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-08-0361]
  4. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2008AA04Z113]
  5. Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [08JC1412000, 10DZ1960102, 2012M510112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Case-based reasoning (CBR) has shown significant superiority in creative application (innovation) in many areas, especially those strong in practice but poor in theory, such as engineering design. But existing CBR systems have poor semantic understanding, which seriously hampers their creative application. So this paper mainly focuses on the research of case retrieval of CBR system and proposes an intelligent case retrieval method by integrating ontology technology into CBR system. The proposed method has enough semantic understanding ability and can help designers find the desired case, from which designers can gain enlightenment and inspiration for developing new ideas. The work of this research is mainly that adopt the combination of two ontology acquisition means to improve domain knowledge acquisition and propose a new semantic retrieval method to improve semantic understanding of case retrieval. At last a kind of typical engineering design - injection mold design is taken an example to validate the proposed method and Lots of experiments are organized to test the performance and the results show that the proposed approach outperforms existing models. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available