4.7 Article

Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) system for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease

Journal

COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages 120-127

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.08.012

Keywords

Usability testing; User testing; eHealth; Electronic patient reported outcome measures; Electronic system; Chronic kidney disease; ePROM

Funding

  1. Health Foundation's Improvement Science Programme
  2. National Institute for Health Research Fellowship
  3. NIHR through the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for West Midlands (CLAHRC-WM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a long-term medical condition associated with symptoms which may negatively impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures or questionnaires may be used to capture symptoms/HRQOL experienced by patients with advanced CKD. Method: Two PRO questionnaires were electronically adapted and incorporated in an electronic system developed at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHB), Birmingham. Usability testing was conducted with patients with advanced CKD. Qualitative methodology was used to elicit participants' views. Results: Participants had a mean age of 64.3 years (range: 36-87 years). All owned electronic devices and had access to the internet. The mean time required to complete the two electronic questionnaires was 15.9 min (range = 8-34 min). Patients who had difficulties with the system were those who had the least experience of using the internet and electronic devices. The average usability and satisfaction score was 4.6 (5-point scale). Conclusions: Our study suggests that individuals with advanced CKD may find the Renal ePROM system acceptable and easy to use. The use of the Renal ePROM may complement clinician-reported outcomes and assist with the management of patients with advanced CKD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available