4.7 Article

Modelling water retention and volume change behaviours of unsaturated soils in non-isothermal conditions

Journal

COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages 1-13

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.07.011

Keywords

Soil-water retention curve (SWRC); Volume change; Temperature; Non-isothermal; Thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling; Unsaturated soils

Funding

  1. Discovery Early Career Research Award (DECRA) from the Australian Research Council [DE130101342]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a simple approach to modelling the effect of temperature on the soil-water retention curves (SWRCs) of deformable soils and takes into consideration the following two aspects: (1) the effect of temperature on the liquid-gas interfacial tension and (2) temperature-induced deformation of the soil skeleton. The first aspect, the temperature effect, can be modelled using an equation proposed by Grant and Salehzadeh [18], but the second aspect is generally neglected in the literature. To quantify the thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) deformation of unsaturated soils (i.e., the second aspect mentioned above), a simple volume change equation, referred to as the non-isothermal SFG volumetric equation, is proposed on the basis of the original SFG framework [37]. A three-dimensional THM yield surface in the space of net mean stress, suction and temperature is presented here. The proposed volume change equation is integrated into the non-isothermal SWRC by means of a simple hydro-mechanical coupling law [38]. The performance of the non-isothermal SFG volumetric equation and the non-isothermal SWRC equation is investigated through several numerical examples. A number of experimental results reported in the literature are employed to confirm the validity of the proposed non-isothermal SFG volume change equation and the non-isothermal SWRC equation. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available