4.7 Article

A new and simple stress-dependent water retention model for unsaturated soil

Journal

COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 216-222

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.07.012

Keywords

Water retention curve; Constitutive relation; Unsaturated soil; Suction

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China through the National Basic Research Program (973 Project) [2012CB719805, 2012CB719800]
  2. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) [HKUST6/CRF/12R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The water retention curve (WRC) is an important hydraulic property of unsaturated soil needed for seepage analysis. Experimental evidence shows that the WRC is affected by various factors such as net stress and soil type. Many attempts have been made to describe the effects of net stress by including the void ratio in a water retention model. But the void ratio (i.e., soil density) is not the only parameter altered by the application of net stress. The pore structure, including the pore size distribution, pore shape and pore orientation, is also changed. Thus the influence of net stress on the WRC should not be treated as equivalent to density effects. In this study, it is verified that the inclusion of the void ratio cannot adequately capture the effects of net stress on the water retention behaviour. A new and simple water retention model is thus developed by considering the stress effects on the void ratio as well as the pore structure. The model is then applied to simulate the WRCs of three different soils tested over a wide range of stress conditions, including isotropic and anisotropic stress conditions. The results show that better predictions of experimental data can be made by incorporating the effects of net stress on both the void ratio and the pore structure. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available