4.7 Article

Automatic classification of non-touching cereal grains in digital images using limited morphological and color features

Journal

COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 99-105

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2012.09.007

Keywords

Machine vision; Cereal grain classification; Automated discrimination

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canada Research Chairs program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Classification of cereal grains, namely; barley, oat, rye and wheat (Canada Western Amber Durum (CWAD) and Canada Western Red Spring (CWRS)) was performed using morphological and color features. Grain image boundary contours were extracted from the digital images of kernels, expressed as chain-coded points and then approximated by 13 elliptic Fourier coefficients. After normalization of the rotation and starting point of the contours, symmetrical standard coefficients were determined. The symmetrical Fourier index (S-FX) of individual kernels was calculated from the product of the sum of absolute symmetrical coefficients and the circularity (roundness) index. Three geometric features, namely; aspect ratio (AR), major diameter (M-D) and roundness (C-eq) were determined using ellipse fitting and Green's transformation of curve integrals, respectively. The morphological classification model was defined using S-FX, AR, M-D, and C-eq. The color classification model was defined using color indices of individual kernels, which were calculated from the RGB color values of their images. The classification accuracies of different models were evaluated and compared. The combined model defined by morphological and color features achieved a classification accuracy of 98.5% for barley, 99.97% for CWRS, 99.93% for oat, and 100% for rye and CWAD. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available