4.7 Article

Automated canopy temperature estimation via infrared thermography: A first step towards automated plant water stress monitoring

Journal

COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE
Volume 73, Issue 1, Pages 74-83

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.04.007

Keywords

Canopy temperature estimation; Crop water stress index (CWSI); Gaussian mixture clustering; Data fusion; Colour identification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Canopy temperature estimation is an important process for plant water status monitoring. In this paper the problem for measurement data of the scene acquired via an infrared (IR) thermography system is considered. An optical image taken from the plant canopy is aligned with the underlying IR image, so that plant leaf area can be extracted via simple colour identification techniques and then the temperature distribution of the leaf area is obtained. The success of this procedure relies on the assumption that both optical-IR image alignment and leaf area extraction are perfect. In practice, such assumptions are rarely justifiable and the computed result can often be found undesirable. Particularly, the simple colour identification technique fails when temperatures of reference leaves, which are embedded in the canopy and provide known conductance to water vapour, are required to be estimated. In this paper, we address this issue and propose a novel algorithm to solve the problem. The underlying plant leaf temperature distribution is considered to be the fusion of two temperature densities separable via a combination of colour identification and Gaussian mixture distribution extraction techniques. A N-average method is tested with moderate success to estimate reference leaf temperatures from the estimated leaf temperature distribution. Our experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and consistency of the proposed algorithm. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available