4.7 Article

Parallel computing in topology optimization of structures with stress constraints

Journal

COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages 62-73

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.04.016

Keywords

Parallel computing; Topology optimization; Stress constraints; Minimum weight; OpenMP

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [DPI2009-14546-C02-01, DPI2010-16496]
  2. R&D projects of the Xunta de Galicia [PGDITO9MDS00718PR, PGDITO9REM005118PR]
  3. FEDER funds
  4. Fundacion de la Ingenieria Civil de Galicia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Minimum weight formulations with stress constraints have been recently proposed as an alternative to the traditional maximum stiffness statements for the topology optimization of structures. These minimum weight approaches offer some advantages and avoid unwanted phenomena associated to maximum stiffness approaches, e.g. mesh dependency, checkerboard layouts. In addition, minimum weight formulations analyze more usual statements from a practical point of view in engineering since they reduce the cost of the structure and impose stress constraints. The minimum weight formulation with stress constraints proposed in this paper guarantees the feasibility of the optimal solutions obtained while the cost is minimized. However, these formulations also require bigger computing effort than the traditional maximum stiffness statements since the number of highly non-linear stress constraints is drastically increased while the number of design variables is analogous. Thus, it is necessary to introduce numerical methods and computational techniques that allow to reduce the resources required. In this paper, we propose the use of parallelization techniques in order to reduce the computing time required to solve the topology optimization problem with stress constraints proposed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available